Subject: Re: soundscape analysis
From: Mr A. J. Moore (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Dec 15 1999 - 06:45:16 EST
I concur with Dr. Worby on this one.
analysis should be led by the ears but new perspectives can
be shown by "forcing" something that may not intuitively
be thought to give good results (its sort of like making
your own algorithm and despite it making really bad music,
pumping out a complete set of works based upon it).
a comment upon jb reply - one must first ask..
are you formulating a top-down approach here ?
> I have just read the posts in this thread, and can't resist pointing out
> this crucial spelling mistake:
> > Dear Carlos,
> > Audiosclupt can produce spectrogram analysis which I have found
> > very usefull for creating graphic scores. Personally I find a combination
> > of spectrogram and waveform the most usefull when trying to analise music.
> Isn't electro-acoustic music _anal_ enough already!? :-)
-- Dr Adrian Moore tel - 44 (0)114 2220486 Sheffield University fax - 44 (0)114 2668053 Music Department email@example.com Western Bank www.shef.ac.uk/~mu1ajm Sheffield. S10 2TN. www.shef.ac.uk/~mus UK www.sonicartsnetwork.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Wed Jun 11 2003 - 13:09:16 EDT