Subject: Re: Linux wins Prix Ars due to MICROSOFT INTERVENTION
From: Alexandra Hettergott (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Sep 06 1999 - 14:43:56 EDT
-- Let me just express my astonishment regarding your being suprised by this simple
act of manipulation... On the other hand -- and this is something I am really finding
very positive -- the being involved of the relevant and (financially) potential
branches of industry does guarantee -- simply by virtue of their own true
(competitive) interest -- the maintenance and progress of the ever-highest
technological level, from which we, after all, really all draw profit...
And : bravo, as regards the AE Austra(li)a MP3 direct streaming (and publically
accessible...) event +ACE-
1, avenue des Gobelins
T+AOk-l/fax: +-33-(0)1-43 31 41 27
... la noche,
... sombra y espacio, tierra
algo que corre y cae
y pasa ...
From: marleen+AEA-dds.nl +ADw-marleen+AEA-dds.nl+AD4-
To: cecdiscuss+AEA-concordia.ca +ADw-cecdiscuss+AEA-concordia.ca+AD4-
Date: Sunday, September 05, 1999 11:41 PM
Subject: Linux wins Prix Ars due to MICROSOFT INTERVENTION
Below you will find a press statement from members of the
.net jury of this years Prix Ars Electronica. You will read
about the real paths that lead us, the jury, to award this
years golden nica to the operating system linux.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Linz, Sep 6, 1999
Centrum de Waag
Amsterdam/ The Netherlands
Dr. Christine Schoepf
ORF Prix Ars Electronica 99
ARS ELECTRONICA PLAYGROUND FOR CORPORATE STRATEGIES
We, the +ACI-net.+ACI- jury, have just learned that next years
ars electronica festival will be titled +ACI-OPEN SOURCE+ACI-.
This has been inofficially agreed on by the direction of
the ARS ELECTRONICA and the sponsors Siemens, Microsoft,
Oracle and HP, e.a. From reliable sources we also learned
that the decision was made weeks before the +ACI-.net+ACI--jury
decision on +ACI-linux+ACI-.
WHY WE ARE GOING PUBLIC
Because we have also just learned that the above-mentioned
IT-companies are involved in a linux distribution joint
venture and a strategic alliance. Their joint venture startup
will most probably become one of the leading linux
distributors, directly attacking Red Hat and SUSE.
This is the classic oligopolistic strategy.
They cannot buy linux, nevertheless, they will take control
over the distibution of the competitor.
We were suspicious before, but now we are strongly convinced
that there was indirect but heavy influence by corporate and
ars electronica executives to reach the +ACI-linux+ACI- decision...
THE JURY WEEK-END
For the jury welcome dinner, a few corporate people had been
invited, too. Everybody was discussing about where Ars
Electronica could or should be going. For the corporate people
the main hype was of course the .net category, e-commerce and
the commercial impact of the +ACI-mass communications+ACI- medium
internet... and they were all constantly talking about the
creative potential of linux and its open source strategy.
Then, at the actual jury meeting, deciding on a winner appeared
to be quite a hard decision (not to say compromise). Whilst the
majority of the jury had a clear favourite in the russian info-
intelligence startup +ACI-etxtreme.ru+ACI-, another juror started
talking about +ACI-that we need to decide on something that is really
taking two steps ahead, not some arty-farty stuff+ACI-. So +ACI-linux+ACI- just
came up as a smart solution. we took this path, we formulated our
statement and came up with the source code as art work, with our
position against +ACI-beautiful+ACI- web-sites. it was a strong moment.
And we saw linux as the perfect continuum to the corporate artwork
of etoy.com, the Ars Electronica winners of 1996.
TERRORVISION AND THE LOGICAL CONCLUSION
But the information about the secret linux distribution joint
venture between Microsoft and Siemens in combination with next
years topic made us alert.
Our conclusion: the industry has strongly lobbied and put
pressure on at least one jury member to award +ACI-linux+ACI-. We now
have to interpret this in persepective of next years ars topic.
They pushed the topic. The idea is to use the art and science
community to soft launch their linux activities and control
open source strategies. They do understand that open source
has evolved into a stronger development strategy and they have
to jump that train early enough, in order to avoid another
So as artists writers and scientists we are used as lab-rats
and cheap alternative researchers. This is NOT what artists
need and it is certainly not what Ars Electronica should be
We believe that investigative journalism is needed to further
describe and interpret this incident..
We definitely want to engage in bringing transparency into the
+ACI-who+AGA-s, when+AGA-s, where+AGA-s, and for how much money+ACI- of this years
decision making process of Prix Ars Electronica.
For the press, we are available for background information and
extended infos on the topic via email or at our on-the-fly press
sept 8, 1999, 1630h
brucknerhaus in linz
Derrick de Kerckhove
Centrum de Waag
Amsterdam/ The Netherlands
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Wed Jun 11 2003 - 13:09:07 EDT