Re: more observances


Subject: Re: more observances
From: THamiltn@aol.com
Date: Sun Jul 18 1999 - 11:27:17 EDT


In a message dated 7/18/99 11:14:31 AM, austin@sndart.cemi.unt.edu writes:

>> (Historical note: Source magazine created much greater revulsion among
>> 'academic musicians' than almost any other change in the 60s and 70s.
>> It's implications are still being digested 30 years later. Now _that's_
>> impact!)

At least then, as students, we HAD a "Source" of information about a slice of
the avant garde as it actually existed. Never mind what the academics felt,
the ideas got across anyway. How does that happen now?

*TOM*



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Wed Jun 11 2003 - 13:09:02 EDT