Subject: Re: more observances
Date: Sun Jul 18 1999 - 11:27:17 EDT
In a message dated 7/18/99 11:14:31 AM, firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
>> (Historical note: Source magazine created much greater revulsion among
>> 'academic musicians' than almost any other change in the 60s and 70s.
>> It's implications are still being digested 30 years later. Now _that's_
At least then, as students, we HAD a "Source" of information about a slice of
the avant garde as it actually existed. Never mind what the academics felt,
the ideas got across anyway. How does that happen now?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Wed Jun 11 2003 - 13:09:02 EDT