Re: remix?


Subject: Re: remix?
From: a l an b am f o rd (alanb@lavalink.com.au)
Date: Tue Jul 13 1999 - 04:33:30 EDT


gabbling on about remix? Larry was heard to mutter...

> Dear cec list:
>
> A term that--for me--has taken on a
> new meaning is "re-mix".
>
> By extrapolation I think I understand the
> new usage. Rather than its former meaning
> as a verb--when a composer makes a 2nd, 3rd,
> Nth mix of materials for, say, a tape piece--it
> has a broader meaning these days as a noun:
> a re-combination of the materials of a
> piece--our own or even some other composer's
> or composers' (!) already finished piece(s).

you've got it..though it involves the same processesas the other meaning you mention.

ab
>
> Have I got this new usage right?
>
> Larry Austin
>

"Love is not love that alters when it alteration finds"
Wild Bill Shakespeare.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Wed Jun 11 2003 - 13:09:02 EDT