Re: "sh"ould/"c"ould - wood.


Subject: Re: "sh"ould/"c"ould - wood.
From: matt kober (mattkober@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Jun 24 1999 - 19:28:13 EDT


--- Stephen Rieck <stephen.rieck1@sympatico.ca> wrote:

> The only good reason to talk about music at all, is
> education; so
> please, I would appreciate a comprehensive, precise
> and accurate
> definition of the words "electroacoustic", "techno",
> or even "music"?
> Might it demonstrate that I have attained some
> desired level of wisdom
> from this thread, if I consider these words,
> subsequently unsubcribe,
> keep my ears open, brain on, and mouth shut? Of
> course not, but what
> afterall, does all this come to? I would and could
> (and probably should)
> greatly appreciate it, if someone articulated a
> conclusion, an outcome,
> a result for me that is useful in my work.

three pounds of flax.

--anomalous wrote:

>Look at rock'n'roll of the 50's and what
>it
>connotates now.

Lieber/Stoller... the Robins... "riot in cell block #9".... = EA!!!!!

peece

M@

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Wed Jun 11 2003 - 13:09:01 EDT