Subject: Re: Hmmmmm
From: Kevin Busby (email@example.com)
Date: Tue May 18 1999 - 07:39:53 EDT
Chris Rolfe wrote:
>Still, to turn your point on its head, my
>environment comprises a lot of electroacoustic material, from Muzak to
>boom-cars to my neighbours loud party last Wednesday. Should I be barred
>from using any field recording containing an incidental snippet of Britney,
>or a Muzak track?
If one is repeatedly subjected to Britney's music against one's will, it
could be argued that one has certain rights (if not a duty!) to recycle it.
Uplifting reading on the media environment are available, as ever, from
Negativland. See, for example, http://www.negativland.com/fairuse.html
("The act of appropriating from this media assault represents a kind of
liberation from our status as helpless sponges which is so desired by the
advertisers who pay for it all. It is a much needed form of self-defense
against the one-way, corporate-consolidated media barrage...")
Unfortunately the site does not seem to have been updated to comment on
-- Kevin Busby, Studio Manager, Department of Music, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, England. Tel: +44-(0)121-414 5785. Fax: +44-(0)121 414 5781. If your email to me bounces, please see http://web.bham.ac.uk/busbykg/contact.html. No to GE crops.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Wed Jun 11 2003 - 13:08:58 EDT