Subject: Re: On illegal software in an academic assignment ...
From: Richard Wentk (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Nov 13 2005 - 17:54:15 EST
At 22:22 13/11/2005, you wrote:
>As a sometime user of Csound and Reaktor, I would have to say that one can
>definitely do much more with Csound than with Reaktor. Although the very
>cool realtime granulation stuff in Reaktor does not exist in Csound, there
>is much more in Csound that does not exist or is difficult to create in
Csound is full of OpenSource-think at the modular level. It's packed with
third-rate imitations and simulations of modules and processes borrowed
from other sources and mostly not implemented with any obvious competence.
You can script more fluidly in Max/MSP or SuperCollider, and both offer
more features, implemented more thoughtfully. So while there's certainly a
niche for a scripted audio language, Csound isn't it. Being free shouldn't
be used as an excuse for its many shortcomings.
On the other hand, it is quite good at making student pieces that sound
like a lorry load of Theremins or DX7s falling off a cliff. :-)
>As you surely must know, the path of innovation in music engineering has
>more often been from academia to industry
academia != OpenSource
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:14 EST