Re: CIMESP-Results Fwd:


Subject: Re: CIMESP-Results Fwd:
From: Michael Gogins (gogins@pipeline.com)
Date: Mon Nov 07 2005 - 00:34:31 EST


EA is a genre in the same way that orchestral music is a genre. EA is music
where the instrument is a computer or electronic gear in the sense that
without the computer or the gear, the pieces do not sound so good.

There are many styles from many periods with this genre (EA, or orchestral
music) and yet, there are obvious commonalties deriving from the
possibilities of the instrument.

Best,
Mike

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Austin" <kevin.austin@videotron.ca>
To: <cec-conference@concordia.ca>
Cc: <cec-conference@concordia.ca>; "bill thompson" <innerd00r@yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: CIMESP-Results Fwd:

>I would ask those who use the term ea to 'define' it in some way. I have
>provided a specific but very wide definition. When I read the postings
>here, I sometimes think of the mute giving directions to the blind person.
>
> My proposition is that ea is not a genre, and ask that perhaps a better
> set of terms be found to speak about pieces that go from Presque Rien to
> Silver Apples of the Moon to I of IV (Oliveros).
>
>
> At 05:20 -0800 2005/11/05, bill thompson wrote:
>>i wonder if the issue really is that ea, at least in academic
>>circles/world is now a genre,
>
>
>
>>much as any other music style,
>
> IME (and the model I propose) with ea, the terms "music" and 'style' may
> not be fully applicable.
>
> What aspects of Presque Rien are 'more' musical than the RTE 'reading'
> (sic) of Circe, the Nighttown Episode (XV) -- including the extensive use
> of vocoding (a short example is at 28:47 in the radio program),
> reverberation / echo effects (30:27- 31:10, 32:54 - 33:26, 36:34 - 36:55,
> "the word!" 38:48 - 38:57, 39:56 - 40:14; etc) --
> http://www.rte.ie/readingulysses/episode15.html .
> http://www.rte.ie/readingulysses/
>
>
>
>
>>my own frustration though is when this idea of it being a genre/style is
>>not recognized or when/if ea is tauted as the supreme/ultimate form of
>>electronic/computer based musics. it's not. it's just one branch. it's a
>>good branch, well developed, lots of intelligence within the work, but
>>sometimes i feel a bit myopic.
>
> I continue to get the sense that your use of the word "ea" relates to the
> acousmatic tradition, for which I might suggest a quick reading (!!0 of
> Francois Bayle "musique acousmatique, propositions ... positions" INA-GRM
> 1993. http://www.ears.dmu.ac.uk/articleBiblio.php3?id_article=598
> (although EARs seems not to give any detailed explanations of a number of
> terms found in this book).
>
>
>
> Best
>
> Kevin
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:14 EST