Subject: Narrative and Semantic (I)
From: Kevin Austin (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Oct 11 2005 - 00:28:20 EDT
I don't agree with this statement. I find 'music' no more devoid of
explicit semantic content than verbal language. Again there is the
comment about what "really" is present -- different models of reality
IMV, the language (either verbal or musical) does not contain the
semantic content, this is supplied by the person who receives the
Oh as I was young and easy in the mercy of his means,
Time held me green and dying
Though I sang in my chains like the sea.
>Richard Wentk (or Eliot) wrote:
>>The final destination here is to wonder if because music has no
>>explicit semantic content, what it's really made of is the bag of
>>timbral, tonal and rhythmic tricks that aid memorability in speech
>>commnication *if you remove the semantic content of what's being
Ah ... I see you have been studying Chinese as well. Fellow travelers.
>> - in other words tricks like repetition, assonance, alliteration,
>>onomatopeia, and self-similarity (rhyme).
Rhyme: self-similarity of spectrum.
>>But sound on its own can never *be* that kind of narrative, because
>>it doesn't offer the full range of semantic features that speech
>>and text do.
For me, musics offer a wider range of semantic features than speech
and text, but that could be my fundamental illiteracy (having grown
up in the slums of North London).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:12 EST