Subject: Re: Postmoderinism : Revised quick guide
From: Eliot Handelman (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:49:46 EDT
lawrence casserley wrote:
> On 4 Oct, 2005, at 19:33, Morgan Sutherland wrote:
>> That confuses me even further. I liked the original explanation which
>> was apparently wrong?
> No - the whole point of PM is that nothing is actually "wrong" - all
> people must be able to express themselves in their own way - it is the
> expression of self that is important. I am happy with that - I want
> people to be able to express themselves well.
Lawrence, this is an incoherent position and as an interepretation of
postmodernism it IS wrong.
You might think that trampling on other people's rights is wrong.
"Free" self-expression for all is possible only in a world where the
possibilities of expression have
been narrowed down to a set of innocuous masturbatory acts that no one
else has any interest
in. Is that what interests you?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:12 EST