Subject: Re: Postmoderinism : Revised quick guide
From: Morgan Sutherland (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Oct 04 2005 - 18:17:48 EDT
Ah, it's coming into light now.
On 10/4/05, lawrence casserley <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 4 Oct, 2005, at 19:33, Morgan Sutherland wrote:
> > That confuses me even further. I liked the original explanation which
> > was apparently wrong?
> No - the whole point of PM is that nothing is actually "wrong" - all
> people must be able to express themselves in their own way - it is the
> expression of self that is important. I am happy with that - I want
> people to be able to express themselves well.
> Where I have a problem is that it doesn't seem to be clear how genuine
> expression of "self", and simply self promotion, relate, or interfere,
> with one another. This seems to lead to a cult of "celebrity", where
> most people are still inhibited in their own expression. But people who
> go on "Big Brother", etc, and other people who are famous for being
> famous, become celebrated, at least temporarily.
> There does seem to be a bias in PM for celebrating appearance over
> substance (although this is not, of course, unprecedented!).
> Is this a good or a bad thing? Discuss......
> PS - great thread - some really interesting stuff coming up - Elliot,
> Dennis, Richard, etc please keep it up!
> Lawrence Casserley - email@example.com
> Lawrence Electronic Operations - www.lcasserley.co.uk
> Colourscape Music Festivals - www.colourscape.org.uk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:12 EST