Re: WHY COMPUTER MUSIC SUCKS_Bob Ostertag


Subject: Re: WHY COMPUTER MUSIC SUCKS_Bob Ostertag
From: Kevin Austin (kevin.austin@videotron.ca)
Date: Tue Oct 04 2005 - 10:17:36 EDT


The article is a reflection on the state / condition of the writers'
(sic) mind.

It could be that the glass is half empty, or it could be half full,
or it could be "Who needs this g*dd*m useless m*thrf*n glass of water
anyway!".

The glass of water hasn't changed.

How many psychoanalysts does it take to change a glass of water?

How many fathers does it take to change a smelly baby?

Best

Kevin

At 09:51 -0400 2005/10/04, Morgan Sutherland wrote:
>Popular music is not computer music? What constitutes computer music?
>All digital? No recording?
>
>On 10/4/05, Chris Leon <chrisleon@videotron.ca> wrote:
>> WHY COMPUTER MUSIC SUCKS_Bob Ostertag
>> WHY COMPUTER MUSIC SUCKS
> > Bob Ostertag
>>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:12 EST