Subject: Re: WHY COMPUTER MUSIC SUCKS_Bob Ostertag
From: Kevin Austin (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Oct 04 2005 - 10:17:36 EDT
The article is a reflection on the state / condition of the writers'
It could be that the glass is half empty, or it could be half full,
or it could be "Who needs this g*dd*m useless m*thrf*n glass of water
The glass of water hasn't changed.
How many psychoanalysts does it take to change a glass of water?
How many fathers does it take to change a smelly baby?
At 09:51 -0400 2005/10/04, Morgan Sutherland wrote:
>Popular music is not computer music? What constitutes computer music?
>All digital? No recording?
>On 10/4/05, Chris Leon <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> WHY COMPUTER MUSIC SUCKS_Bob Ostertag
>> WHY COMPUTER MUSIC SUCKS
> > Bob Ostertag
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:12 EST