Re: Quick guide to postmodernism (was: Re: Gibson (was: Re: Computer chicken))


Subject: Re: Quick guide to postmodernism (was: Re: Gibson (was: Re: Computer chicken))
From: Morgan Sutherland (skiptracer@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Oct 03 2005 - 18:12:50 EDT


From what I've seen in this thread, I've absorbed that PM is art with
acknowledgment of the outside world, culture... art made by an "I" who
is not something sacred, but a result of outside influence. Modern is
ignoring culture and influence, focusing on inner. Or am I wrong? If
I'm right, this is a lot like the "clean slate" vs. "inheritance"
argument in psychology.

On 10/3/05, Eliot Handelman <eliot@generation.net> wrote:
> Morgan Sutherland wrote:
>
> >Well? I'm asking the question genuinely, not in that
> >suggestion-kindly-that-you-are-completely-and-absolutely-wrong way. =)
> >
> >
> "But isn't that what post-modernism is? Creating music based on what
> will be said about it? "
>
>
>
> You're obliging me to read your mind in presenting the question the way
> you did -- I'm not sure what you mean.
>
> I showed you that your sentence doesn't add up -- you can try to
> rephrase it.
>
> -- eliot
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:12 EST