Re: Emotional Association with Structure/Patterns/Sounds


Subject: Re: Emotional Association with Structure/Patterns/Sounds
From: Morgan Sutherland (skiptracer@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Sep 29 2005 - 10:15:00 EDT


Obviously there are not direct answers, but we are working towards
answers, are we not? Unless of course we are enlightened. Living in
the question is always good, but living for the answer is more fun,
temporarily.

Is there a general consensus?

On 9/29/05, Owen Green <o.t.green@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Morgan Sutherland wrote:
> > It's so aggravating when you ask these types of questions on the
> > Internet because I end up with a long list of books...
> >
> > I'm looking for scientific reports and recommendations, not lists.
>
> Why? These things are discussions, not facts. No amount of scientific
> experiment is going to provide 'answers' to your questions because
> aesthetics are also bound up in relationships between people, not in
> only in a series of inevitable physical reactions to stimuli.
>
> Making and perceiving music is always, in some respect, a social event;
> we make it with the inetion that other people should listen to it, we
> make it with other people etc.
>
> For sure, the results of scientific enquiry are useful - acoustics,
> psychoacoustics, and signal processing in particular - but a practice
> based solely upon these factors would be impoverished. The real meat of
> people's reactions are bound up in factors that are inherently fluid,
> un-fixed, thus the joyous mountain of ideas, theories and outright
> speculations, almost none of which you'll find yourself in total
> agreement with. Huzzah!
>
> > If you could recommend one book, what would it be. (on this subject)
>
> I wouldn't dream of doing such a thing :) People have mentioned Meyer
> already; I find him easy to read, and he mostly talks sense. There would
> be books I would take great pleasure in not reccomending, if I thought
> there was anything constructive to be gained from /not/ reading a book,
> even one which is almost entirely disagreeable and poisonous (maybe
> they're of particular value).
>
>
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:12 EST