Re: Google Accused of Copyright Infringement (continued)


Subject: Re: Google Accused of Copyright Infringement (continued)
From: Eliot Handelman (eliot@generation.net)
Date: Thu Sep 22 2005 - 04:17:50 EDT


Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:

>At 10:08 PM 9/21/05 -0700, Eliot Handelman wrote:
>
>
>>Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
>>
>>
>>>If artists cooperated in large-scale projects with high visibility, the
>>>proportion of the past would be smaller and the chance of that visibility
>>>would help shift, if even a little bit, the dominance of the past.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>I'm still not following. What dominance? The sense that the past was
>>artistically more fecund than the
>>present?
>>
>>
>
>Are those that trick questions? What do you think? (Now *that's* a trick
>question.)
>
>Dennis
>
>
>
What do I think about the past, which isn't a real question, or is there
some issue about survining as
an individual creator post google library? Or is this about the question
of getting more people
interested in fringe music? Or was it about how to make a living as an
artist in an unpopular
artform ?

sorry I'm short on this -- I was really just following the discussion
with wishing to hijack it. Q2
about post google individualism is interesting to me.

-- eliot

 

 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:11 EST