Subject: Re: question on portable recording devices
From: Ned Bouhalassa (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Sep 15 2005 - 02:39:03 EDT
Well, for one thing, you can only record at 44.1 using the Edirol.
On 15-Sep-05, at 1:07 AM, Thomas Phillpotts wrote:
> Would anyone comment on the Edirol R-1 portable
> recorder compared to the M-Audio MicroTrack? I'm
> concerned mostly with quality; would there be a big
> difference between a 24bit 96kHz wav file recorded on
> each (using the same microphone say)?
w w w . n e d f x . c o m
n e d @ n e d f x . c o m
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:11 EST