Subject: Re: Re : (junk yard dog in) hidden place
From: lawrence casserley (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Sep 14 2005 - 15:53:52 EDT
On 14 Sep, 2005, at 18:59, Michael Gogins wrote:
> With respect to music history and innovation, there are (at least,
> broadly speaking) two situations. Western art music has a particular
> kind of historical consciousness that glorifies innovation. In the
> music of other cultures (not that I'm an expert), there are different
> kinds of historical consciousness. I know enough about some
> non-Western-art-music styles to know that musical innovation occurs in
> them and is important, since there is an obvious sequence of styles
> from generation to generation, and obvious cross-cultural influences,
> even predating Western influences. But it's not quite the same thing,
> the same feeling of being driven by or out of history, not the same
> insistence on innovation.
Could this be put another way? In some of these cultures at least there
is more emphasis on being part of a tradition - each artist interprets
the tradition in her/is own way, so a constant evolution occurs, but
the respect for the tradition always remains.
OTOH, in Western culture, at least since about the 18th century,
iconoclasm has been the driving force - history is bunk! This seems to
coincide with the development of science - the idea of continuous
advancement of knowledge as the driving force of our culture.
In this model there is no stability - this week's theorem will be
disproved next week - only innovation has meaning.
Just a thought.
Lawrence Casserley - firstname.lastname@example.org
Lawrence Electronic Operations - www.lcasserley.co.uk
Colourscape Music Festivals - www.colourscape.org.uk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:10 EST