Re: MP4


Subject: Re: MP4
From: Rick (ricknance@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Aug 29 2005 - 11:58:31 EDT


It's only an issue if you insist on real-time streaming. 2:1 is pretty
good when you're talking lossless. And the local broadband (NTL) is
changing their standard to 10MB/s this year and automatically
upgrading everyone with 3MB lines.

=======
* 10Mb to become the standard cable broadband speed for ntl customers
* All ntl Broadband customers eligible for 10Mb upgrade at no extra monthly cost
* Current 3Mb customers will be the first to receive the new service
========

and really, that 10:1 isn't REALLY compression, it's decimation.

I'd be happier to wait and download.

On 8/29/05, Richard Wentk <richard@skydancer.com> wrote:

>
> The issue with FLAC, SHN and the other lossless codecs is that compression
> ratios aren't usually better than 2:1, as opposed to the 10:1 or so of
> 128kbps MP3. There's a theoretical limit from information theory, and it's
> not something that's ever going to be improved on - at least not without a
> very different approach to music creation and distribution.
>
> In any case compression ratios will mean that lossless encoding won't be
> practical for many people until 10mbps broadband becomes standard. For
> lossless 24/96 multichannel distribution 100MB/s would be more plausible.
>
> DRM is a separate issue. Not many people realise that DRM is more about
> selling DRM systems than in locking down audio. I'd guess that one way or
> another, anyone on this list should be able to bypass just about any
> existing DRM system without any trouble at all.
>
> Richard
>
>
>

-- 
======================
Rick Nance
De Montfort University
Leicester, UK
RickNance.org



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:10 EST