Re: what was that?


Subject: Re: what was that?
From: miriam clinton (iriXx) (iriXx@iriXx.org)
Date: Thu Aug 18 2005 - 03:49:41 EDT


James Phelps wrote:

>Neither would it explain why women don't pay attention
>to
>what men write in e-mail and scholarly and technical
>articles. :>)
>
>-Jim Phelps
>
>

word

/bump

>
>
>--- Linda Seltzer <lseltzer@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
>>>>>Sat Aug 6, 7:29 PM ET
>>>>>
>>>>>LONDON (AFP) - Men who are accused of never
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>listening
>>
>>
>>>>>by women now have an excuse -- women's voices
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>are more
>>
>>
>>>>>difficult for men to listen to than other
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>men's, a
>>
>>
>>>>>report said.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>This doesn't explain why men don't pay attention to
>>what women write
>>in e-mail and scholarly and technical articles.
>>
>>Linda Seltzer
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>

-- 
99% of aliens prefer Earth
--Eminem

www.iriXx.org www.copyleftmedia.org.uk



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:10 EST