Re: what was that?


Subject: Re: what was that?
From: miriam clinton (iriXx) (iriXx@iriXx.org)
Date: Thu Aug 18 2005 - 03:49:19 EDT


Linda Seltzer wrote:

>>>>Sat Aug 6, 7:29 PM ET
>>>>
>>>>LONDON (AFP) - Men who are accused of never listening
>>>>by women now have an excuse -- women's voices are more
>>>>difficult for men to listen to than other men's, a
>>>>report said.
>>>>
>>>>
>
>This doesn't explain why men don't pay attention to what women write
>in e-mail and scholarly and technical articles.
>
>Linda Seltzer
>
>

well, if women's articles bore them ****less with diatribes on feminism,
perhaps thats why.

OTOH, if feminism was left out of the question, and both men and women
listen to EACH OTHER, we might get somewhere...

*sigh*

-- 
99% of aliens prefer Earth
--Eminem

www.iriXx.org www.copyleftmedia.org.uk



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:10 EST