Re: what was that?

Subject: Re: what was that?
From: Linda Seltzer (
Date: Wed Aug 17 2005 - 12:28:03 EDT

Thank you for sharing your prejudices.

> For whom is this question? Presumably Linda Seltzer,
> since specificity or, more pointedly,
> quantification/verification of the cited comparison of
> peoples' talent and ability was exactly the point of
> my response. My verbose way of saying ... "how the
> heck do you know that?" It's also another way of
> saying that in 2005 this tenor of argument on this
> issue is tedious, tenuous and tragically tired. I
> would have added "non-productive" but it didn't quite
> fit into my alliteration. :>)
> -Jim Phelps

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:10 EST