Subject: Re: what was that?
From: James Phelps (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Aug 16 2005 - 19:07:17 EDT
For whom is this question? Presumably Linda Seltzer,
since specificity or, more pointedly,
quantification/verification of the cited comparison of
peoples' talent and ability was exactly the point of
my response. My verbose way of saying ... "how the
heck do you know that?" It's also another way of
saying that in 2005 this tenor of argument on this
issue is tedious, tenuous and tragically tired. I
would have added "non-productive" but it didn't quite
fit into my alliteration. :>)
--- sylvi macCormac <macCormac@shaw.ca> wrote:
> can you be more specific ?
> James Phelps wrote:
> > --- Linda Seltzer <email@example.com>
> > > So I do take seriously the matter of white
> > > males with
> > > less talent, ability and education getting all
> > > those plum
> > > academic jobs with full benefits while women are
> > > "free-lancers."
> > It might prove at least entertaining reading
> > attempt to substantiate the "less talent, ability"
> > ... not so sure about the "less education" either.
> > The "male" and "white" features might be easier.
> > -Jim Phelps
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:10 EST