Re: Formants ... contains cat


Subject: Re: Formants ... contains cat
From: sylvi macCormac (macCormac@shaw.ca)
Date: Sat Aug 13 2005 - 13:42:35 EDT


hey big K et.al.

looc . thinks you very much :-) is this cool or what ? apologies for
add-itional jpeg ...
uh but, btw, what is th vocal range (etc) / formant frequencies of kats
/ animals .. ?
is purring a melody or rhythm or just simple text ? ;-) cat spelled
bkwrds still spells kittens :-)

best, sylvi macCormac

Kevin Austin wrote:

> Some of this may be seen in the following jpeg which gives the first
> three formant frequencies for M(en) W(omen) C(hildren) for spoken
> vowels. The diagram notes that men's formants are shifted down to an
> extent, and children's shifted up in relation to those of women
> Sources: Peterson and Barney, JASA 24: 175 (1952), Rossing, The
> Science of Sound (1990) p 320, 352
> Sung vowels: Appleman (1967) The Science of Vowel Pedagogy, Indiana U
> Press (Taken from Selected Readings in Electroacoustics, p 51-53,
> which contains the same information also as a graphic and in music
> notation.) Best Kevin [Image][Image]
>
>> dear Ogga
>>
>> did i hear you say ?
>>
>> !!! ooooo, hgu hgu, tnurg tnurg
>>
>> and pretend it was by James ? nice to meet you Ogga :-)
>>
>> can you xplain this snip > The Mail quoted researcher Michael Hunter
>> as
>> saying, "The female voice is actually more complex than the male
>> voice, due
>> to differences in the size and shape of the vocal cords and larynx
>> between
>> men and women, and also due to women having greater natural 'melody'
>> in their
>> voices.
>> >>>>the brain may find it much harder to conjure up a false female
>> voice
>> accurately than a false male voice.> endquote
>>
>> what th ? and what wzs that aboot melodies ?
>> astute lullabies & rhythms de pods ... ;-) ????
>>
>> what is th range of women's & men's voices ?
>> and where is th usual range of 'our' hearing ?
>>
>> best regards, Aggo ;-)
>>
>>
>> James Bailey wrote:
>>
>> > grunt grunt, ugh ugh, ooooo!!!
>> >
>> > Ogga
>> >
>> > > did anyone else read this article? just gas for the
>> > > fire (ala yahoo news):
>> > >
>> > > Sat Aug 6, 7:29 PM ET
>> > >
>> > > LONDON (AFP) - Men who are accused of never listening
>> > > by women now have an excuse -- women's voices are more
>> > > difficult for men to listen to than other men's, a
>> > > report said.
>> > >
>> > > The Daily Mail, quoting findings published in the
>> > > specialist magazine
>> > >
>> > > NeuroImage, said researchers at Sheffield university
>> > > in northern England discovered startling differences
>> > > in the way the brain responds to male and female
>> > > sounds.
>> > >
>> > > Men deciphered female voices using the auditory part
>> > > of the brain that processes music, while male voices
>> > > engaged a simpler mechanism, it said.
>> > >
>> > > The Mail quoted researcher Michael Hunter as saying,
>> > > "The female voice is actually more complex than the
>> > > male voice, due to differences in the size and shape
>> > > of the vocal cords and larynx between men and women,
>> > > and also due to women having greater natural 'melody'
>> > > in their voices.
>> > >
>> > > "This causes a more complex range of sound frequencies
>> > > than in a male voice."
>> > >
>> > > The findings may help explain why people suffering
>> > > hallucinations usually hear male voices, the report
>> > > added, as the brain may find it much harder to conjure
>> > > up a false female voice accurately than a false male voice.
>> > >
>> > > www.billthompson.org
>> > >
>> > >
>> ........................................................................
>>
>> > > "The more you think about things the weirder they seem." -Calvin
>>
>> > >
>> > > __________________________________________________
>> > > Do You Yahoo!?
>> > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>
>> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>> > >
>
>> >
>
>> > James Bailey
>
>> > host: Electric Storm / A Missing Sense
>
>> > CKLN-FM 88.1 Toronto
>
>> > www.ckln.fm electricstorm@ckln.fm
>


Unknown Document



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:10 EST