Re: (More) Cool sounds from outer space!


Subject: Re: (More) Cool sounds from outer space!
From: John Nowak (john@johnnowak.com)
Date: Mon Aug 01 2005 - 22:42:23 EDT


On Jul 31, 2005, at 6:46 AM, Shane Turner wrote:

> In that case x-ray photography and stellar photography is a "sham"
> also, after all, the images are taken outside of the visible light
> spectrum, and converted down to visible wavelengths. Better not
> look at those x-rays, I'll be "duped!" I wonder if I thought an
> image of the horsehead nebula or the pillars of creation was
> beautiful, would I be guilty of "duping" others by somebody's
> standards?

Don't be such an inflammatory prat. You know quite well you're
distorting what I'm saying to make your point. Besides, what happened
here would be like if you took an x-ray and then listened to it, not
what you described.

> Come to think of it, I'd better not listen to a thunderstorm
> either. After all, all that random, naturally-occuring expansion
> of air waves can hardly be listenable or beautiful.

I never once stated anything about the aesthetic value of anything.
Please, shut up. You are speaking absolute nonsense, and arguing a
point that no one made.

- John



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:09 EST