Subject: Re: (More) Cool sounds from outer space!
From: John Nowak (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Aug 01 2005 - 22:42:23 EDT
On Jul 31, 2005, at 6:46 AM, Shane Turner wrote:
> In that case x-ray photography and stellar photography is a "sham"
> also, after all, the images are taken outside of the visible light
> spectrum, and converted down to visible wavelengths. Better not
> look at those x-rays, I'll be "duped!" I wonder if I thought an
> image of the horsehead nebula or the pillars of creation was
> beautiful, would I be guilty of "duping" others by somebody's
Don't be such an inflammatory prat. You know quite well you're
distorting what I'm saying to make your point. Besides, what happened
here would be like if you took an x-ray and then listened to it, not
what you described.
> Come to think of it, I'd better not listen to a thunderstorm
> either. After all, all that random, naturally-occuring expansion
> of air waves can hardly be listenable or beautiful.
I never once stated anything about the aesthetic value of anything.
Please, shut up. You are speaking absolute nonsense, and arguing a
point that no one made.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:09 EST