Re: Insulae Electronicae Competition


Subject: Re: Insulae Electronicae Competition
From: James Phelps (jimphelps_niucms@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Jul 18 2005 - 03:39:05 EDT


Since I personally find events described as
"competitions" to be counter-productive to the art
itself, and while I completely agree with what Barry
says, I find it thusly secondary if not moot. In my
classes I propose that competitions can serve a
"real-world", "help-me-get-a-job" function (sad as
that scenario might be in itself) but are impertinent
to any meaningful part of the art "process." Although
I admire those who can make the best of a bad
situation - grin and bear it.

-Jim Phelps
 Northern Illinois University

--- truax@sfu.ca wrote:

>
> I'm wondering why any competition for young
> composers, such as this one,
> would disallow pieces that have been performed in
> public from being
> eligible. I would regard public performance (even if
> it's "in house") to be
> a very necessary part of the learning experience of
> trying out a piece in a
> larger space than a studio, and (hopefully) getting
> some feedback from
> listeners.
>
> Disqualifying pieces that have already won awards
> may be a legitimate choice
> of the competition organizer, but to disqualify
> works that have been
> performed in public seems counter-productive to the
> encouragement of young
> composers and raises the uncomfortable spectre of
> pieces that are composed
> only for competitions, not for public consumption.
>
> If someone wants to feature premieres only, then
> they should commission new
> works.
>
> Barry Truax
>
>

                
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:09 EST