Re: Lack of clarity regarding the term EA


Subject: Re: Lack of clarity regarding the term EA
From: Rick (ricknance@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Mar 02 2005 - 02:50:23 EST


cool. Then for the purposes of this particular discussion, I can call
Bach, Shankar, and Woody Guthrie 'EA'.

All clear now. I was confused.

r

On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 02:12:25 -0500, n_kondon@alcor.concordia.ca
<n_kondon@alcor.concordia.ca> wrote:
>
> First off, the electricity within us can be tranduced to sound, and we all know
> how this can be done (clap, stomp, scream, etc).
> Secondly, if you don't consider the energy within us "electricity", then you
> can still consider the fact that there are times when the artist can already
> hear the EA composition in his/her head before actually physically hearing it.
> Hence, EA composition without the transduction of electricity. If you hear an
> EA piece in your dream, is it still EA?
>
>
> nick
>
> >

-- 
Rick Nance
De Montfort University
Leicester, UK
RickNance.org
Acousmatics



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:07 EST