Subject: Re: art not music
Date: Sun Feb 27 2005 - 17:22:05 EST
It may matter to the audience, it may have an effect on how they perceive the
work. It may not but sometimes.
Quoting "miriam clinton (iriXx)" <iriXx@iriXx.org>:
> Eliot Handelman wrote:
> > In my view calling EA "art" doesn't help or change anything. The
> > missing component is the tactical force
> > -- the feeling of what will happen if I listen to this music. Will it
> > cheer me up, expose my chaos, or
> > illuminate something in the universe of man in the way that Bruckner
> > or Nielsen seem to?
> to me, EA is just that - EA.
> it matters not whether it is 'art' or 'music' - what matters is that it
> is the language in which i express what is inside of me. it is my native
> language. this is not to be confused with the mother #1 issue - what i
> am saying is that EA is the best way for me to express the sounds in my
> head... to me that has nothing to do with the definition of whether it
> is art or music - it is beyond needless definitions.
> 99% of aliens prefer Earth
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.5.0 - Release Date: 25/02/2005
-- Andrew McCallum firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:06 EST