Subject: Re: art not music
From: macCormac (macCormac@shaw.ca)
Date: Sun Feb 27 2005 - 08:53:56 EST
maganda arrow (tagali-phillipino) beautiful day
did you say 'th sounds in my bread' ? :-) what is th 'mother # issue' ?
would you like some tea with your toast ?
is EA a definition or a description ? at least dis 'locates' (roughly
speaking) th phenomena (as we know it . . .
best, dj serious babbling brook (fog horns on th western front)
"miriam clinton (iriXx)" wrote:
> Eliot Handelman wrote:
> > In my view calling EA "art" doesn't help or change anything. The
> > missing component is the tactical force
> > -- the feeling of what will happen if I listen to this music. Will it
> > cheer me up, expose my chaos, or
> > illuminate something in the universe of man in the way that Bruckner
> > or Nielsen seem to?
> to me, EA is just that - EA.
> it matters not whether it is 'art' or 'music' - what matters is that it
> is the language in which i express what is inside of me. it is my native
> language. this is not to be confused with the mother #1 issue - what i
> am saying is that EA is the best way for me to express the sounds in my
> head... to me that has nothing to do with the definition of whether it
> is art or music - it is beyond needless definitions.
> 99% of aliens prefer Earth
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.5.0 - Release Date: 25/02/2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:06 EST