Subject: Re: Fixing matters ... Is it time to move on? Re:Don't worry ...
From: Richard Wentk (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Jan 24 2005 - 10:43:15 EST
At 04:04 23/01/2005, you wrote:
>>A notebook computer now has more power than the old Columbia-Princeton
>>and WDR studios put together, so one might provocatively ask, where's the
>>really great music? Why do works like Gesang der Junge or Silver Apples
>>of the Moon stand out in the history of the field? It is not the facility
>>of sound creation that is at issue, but the cultural sophistication of
Actually it's often about being first out with a new toy. The technology
has more or less stopped developing now and is in a consolidation phase, so
being first out with a new toy is no longer possible.
>Subsequent to this, it was determined, as you have found, that the way to
>address these issues in the 21st century is not through the 'academic
>conference' process, but through hammering them out in front of a thousand
>people on email lists.
I think this form of interchange - noisy though it can be - is often
>It is true that my Chair and Dean do not recognize my writing to email
>lists as being (equivalent) to research or "peer-reviewed" publication, I
>will not forsake this (a)venue for communication within the community,
>even though it is 'detrimental' to my (research profile) position in the
>Department, Faculty and University.
This seems very short-sighted on the part of the D&C. But I think one
answer to the problems currently facing bricks and mortar academic
establishments is to move more enthusiastically into various virtual
environments. Here in the UK Southampton has a series of interesting
research projects looking into how this can be done successfully. It might
be worth talking to some of the people there.
There's a lot to be said for face to face contact, but I think any
frameworks that use virtual technologies to blur some of the hard edges
that surround academia could be a very interesting and potentially fruitful
area to explore. This mailing list is a successful prototype. But I think
many of the established rituals in academia - papers, conferences, degree
assessments and the rest - have scope for less rigid variations that would
promote learning and participation among the wider public, without
necessarily diluting the quality of the work being done.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:06 EST