Subject: Re: monitor refresh rates & epilepsy
From: miriam clinton (iriXx) (iriXx@iriXx.org)
Date: Mon Jan 17 2005 - 18:16:43 EST
jef chippewa wrote:
> 85Hz is a significant difference from 60/70, not optimal, but
> noticeably more stable. i immediately noticed the difference
> physically when i got my current monitor, and have never gone below a
> refresh rate of 85 since buying it.
thanks - thats good to know. i think it is the particular brand of HP
monitor i have, but 85 has been excellent this morning, since i changed
it i havent felt screen flicker quite so much (just a little, but its
probably more screen /glare/ now, which means i need a glare shield)....
i'm also glad its not going to lead to monitor burn-out which is what i
was concerned about...
-- 99% of aliens prefer Earth --Eminem
-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.0 - Release Date: 1/17/2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:05 EST