Re: Numbers (was:Re: Osborne response - Cyberfeminism)

Subject: Re: Numbers (was:Re: Osborne response - Cyberfeminism)
From: miriam clinton (iriXx) (
Date: Wed Jan 12 2005 - 18:38:49 EST

come on.... can't you even see the rampant feminism that is now so
in-bred into a teenage girl - the very same feminism that has caused men
to reply with a reluctance to form more than tenuous, temporary

and thats just the tip of the iceberg. if you're all for it... well, go
on, lose your manhood, your uniqueness as a man, and any equality you
might wish for - be subdued by the domineering Feminist, the same way
every other man seems to have jumped - or been pulled - onto the same
bandwagon. feminism is just as chauvinistic as the situation the
suffragettes originally fought against - but they knew when to stop, at
equal rights in casting a vote, not in dragging a noose around a man's neck.

it's called PC thesedays. not politically correct to object to feminism,
is it?

but don't complain when you discover that the wool has been pulled over
your eyes...

enough of this topic... let the blind lead the blind...


J. Simon van der Walt wrote:

>>but don't you think that the bitterness of feminism is twice as bad?
>No. Well, that is, I've never seen the 'bitterness' of feminism. Not in the
>seventies - when I was *heavily* involved in this area, hanging around with
>castrate-all-rapist radical revolutionary feminists and going to Men Against
>Sexism groups - the women I knew then were passionate and crazy, not bitter.
>And I don't see any feminism around *at all* these days; we're all
>post-feminists now, aren't we?
>>its a sad sight to see a
>>man subdued into a woman's slave...
>It's not about a man and a woman, it's about the socially constructed ideas
>of 'man' and 'woman', surely?

99% of aliens prefer Earth

-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.11 - Release Date: 1/12/2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:05 EST