Subject: Re: Vinyl quality vs. digital sound
From: Rick Nance (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Oct 26 2004 - 16:54:04 EDT
The timing would be about right. This was not right at the beginning,
but close enough. It was a pretty easy call. Bit of a chuckle really.
Brian Garbet wrote:
> Of course, a major factor is whether those old original analog tapes
> were re-mastered for CD or whether the label just took the old version
> and digitized it. There was a mad dash for labels to churn out their
> entire catalogues on CD and alot of the results were quite dreadful and
> Rick Nance wrote:
>> I've heard analog playback that I still swear is better than the same
>> publication on CD.
>> Elvis, the Sun Years(?)
>> half-speed master disc vs 16/44.1
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:04 EST