Re: How to package your CDs


Subject: Re: How to package your CDs
From: Li-Chuan Chong (lichuan@btinternet.com)
Date: Wed Jul 28 2004 - 10:38:23 EDT


Cheers, Kev!

Remember now, boys and girls, DO NOT LET A FANCY ARTWORK GET IN THE WAY OF
CLARITY AND COMPREHENSIBILITY.

In Section 5. - Fancy artwork, you'll find...

http://www.learn.keele.ac.uk/03-04/ug-mod/mus/mus-130/packaging/pckgimages/a
rtworkex1.jpg

Caption reads "Good fancy artwork - example":
(Steve Bird is going to thank me now. '_' Don't take it personal.)

On the 'good fancy artwork' itself (which is good by the way), Steve wrote:
"...on track 12 is my first attempt at a serious electroacoustic
composition".

Now, with all the banter on "electroacoustics - rap to tap to zap to frap"
etc. here's someone who believes that 'serious electroacoustic composition'
exists, and attempted it for the first time.

My question is, again shouldn't be taken personally, why belittle anything
else that one does or had ever done as 'less serious', or even
'non-serious'? In contrast, isn't those things leading up to one's "first
attempt" to do anything seriously just as important, and thus equally
'serious'?

Or is it a case of YCBS (McEnroe et al.)?

Chuan

> From: Kevin Austin <kevin.austin@videotron.ca>
> Reply-To: cec-conference@concordia.ca
> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:16:13 -0400
> To: cec-conference@concordia.ca, eamt@concordia.ca
> Subject: How to package your CDs
>
>
>
> PACKAGING and SUBMITTING CDs FOR ASSESSMENT
>
> by Diego Garro - Department of Music, 2004.
>
>
>
>
>
http://www.learn.keele.ac.uk/03-04/ug-mod/mus/mus-130/packaging/cdpackaging.
ht> m
>
>
> Best
>
> Kevin
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:03 EST