Subject: RE: electroacoustics - rap to tap to zap to frap
From: Mauricio Duarte-Neira (039166d) (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Jul 22 2004 - 15:14:04 EDT
I agree. I'm just new in this area (recently grad in music tech). I never really though about it.
I always took it as computer music, "my" computer music whatever form I perceived it to be.
I dont expect anyone to agree with me.
It was just a thought, and I am fascinated with any type of contradictions.
Unfortuantely, a lot of things are categorized in the world, so it came to my mind. :P
But I agree that it can be harmful. I just learned that :) but maybe someone will say no
with a good proof....
So maybe I'll learn otherwise again.....etc.....
From: firstname.lastname@example.org on behalf of John Nowak
Sent: Thu 7/22/2004 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: electroacoustics - rap to tap to zap to frap
On Jul 22, 2004, at 3:01 PM, email@example.com wrote:
> Forgive my bewilderment on the topic, but What is with this insatiable
> need to invent a context-independent, quantifiable set of criteria for
> what is or isn't 'Computer Music?' The ambiguity is really as
> beneficial as it is harmful, and is easily overcome in basic
I agree 100%. That's why I've avoided this conversation. ;-)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:03 EST