Re: electroacoustics - rap to tap


Subject: Re: electroacoustics - rap to tap
From: David Mooney (moko@city-net.com)
Date: Mon Jul 05 2004 - 08:31:53 EDT


eg: Duchamp framing a urinal; Cage framing "silence." Art is
in the eyes/ears of the beholder.

John Nowak wrote:
>
> On Jul 1, 2004, at 12:44 PM, gogins@pipeline.com wrote:
>
> > I'm afraid I don't agree that intention counts for much. A TOTALLY deaf
> > person (no bone conduction or vibration senses, even) could intend to
> > create music -- whatever it was, it would be essentially random. Not
> > noise,
> > but random. No connection to the intention. Is that music? I don't
> > think so.
>
> I disagree. Anything someone puts in an artistic context must be
> examined as art... even if it is not the creator who puts it in that
> context.
>
> - John

-- 
David Mooney
dmooney@city-net.com
http://www.city-net.com/~moko/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sat Dec 22 2007 - 01:46:02 EST