Subject: RE: Techno/Electronica worth a listen?
From: +[doh \)+ (thrash@btclick.com)
Date: Wed Dec 04 2002 - 08:04:53 EST
Haha you had to embaress me in front of all the academics
Didn't you? .. you love it M !!!
Actually early orb is shite
try black dog and plaid instead...
good friends of mine and very good music...
-------------------------------------------------------
kdx: blackbanana.dyndns.org ( www.haxial.com )
mail: thrash@btclick.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-cecdiscuss@concordia.ca
[mailto:owner-cecdiscuss@concordia.ca] On Behalf Of iriXx
Sent: 04 December 2002 12:40
To: cecdiscuss@concordia.ca
Subject: Re: Techno/Electronica worth a listen?
on the topic of IDM - would that also be the right classification for
FSOL then? (future sound of london)
missed them off my list... definately worth hearing
also early Orb.... argh sorry thrash! as they say... its YOU!....
m~
> For some reason, when I heard it a month ago, airdrawndagger reminded
me of
> Larry Heard's work. Don 't know why. Sort of a smooth electronica
happy
> house. Yes, one could call it IDM.
> IDM = intelligent dance music. There a list called IDM at
hyperreal.com.
> All kinds of categories are discussed. House, Trance, Techno D&B
etc.
> "IDM" is - almost - synonymous with "electronica"
>
> As I'm typing this, I'm listening to DJ Ferry Corsten who's into "epic
> trance" and I'm trying to think of exceptions to "IDM" being just
about
> synonymous with "electronica". Maybe IDM has more of a dance tag.
While
> electronica is more of a a tag for more beatless ambient. How about
"IEA"
> "Intelligent electronica acoustica"?
>
> audiochrom
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- iriXx www.iriXx.orgcopyleft: creativity, technology and freedom? info@copyleftmedia.org.uk www.copyleftmedia.org.uk
_ ( ) ascii ribbon against html email X / \ cat /dev/sda1 > /dev/dsp
*** stopping make sense ***
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Wed Jun 11 2003 - 13:06:22 EDT