Re: It's official

From: Charles Bale (cjabale@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 28 2011 - 13:42:38 EDT

• Next message: peiman khosravi: "Re: why would anyone think of a piece in terms of "number of channels"?"
• Previous message: Jörn Nettingsmeier: "Re: why would anyone think of a piece in terms of "number of channels"?"
• In reply to: eric cadesky: "Re: It's official"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I just played with this at the Apple Store. It was actually really fun. The drumkit instrument was surprisingly responsive... Wouldn't be bad for recording rough rhythm ideas that pop onto your head that you want to remember for later.

-Charles

Sent from my iPod

On 2011-03-28, at 12:27 PM, eric cadesky <eric@glassorchestra.com> wrote:

> yes back to the roots - an hour of I, I, I hohoho!
>
> e
>
> On 03-28-2011, at 11:17 AM, Rick wrote:
>
>> cool. Maybe now everybody'll get bored with all that I IV vi V I stuff
>> and move on
>>
>> 2011/3/28 Kevin Austin <kevin.austin@videotron.ca>:
>>> Apple Hot News
>>> GarageBand for iPad: Music Talent Not Required
>>>
>>> http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/silverman/7485204.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Kevin
>>>
>>
>

• Next message: peiman khosravi: "Re: why would anyone think of a piece in terms of "number of channels"?"
• Previous message: Jörn Nettingsmeier: "Re: why would anyone think of a piece in terms of "number of channels"?"
• In reply to: eric cadesky: "Re: It's official"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 28 2011 - 13:50:39 EDT